shh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Naprapathy versus orthopaedic standard care for common musculoskeletal disorders: Aan 8-year follow-up of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial in Sweden
Sophiahemmet University.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5825-3850
Sophiahemmet University.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7530-125x
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Chiropractic and Manual Therapies, E-ISSN 2045-709X, Vol. 29, no 1, article id 43Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal pain is among the most common reasons for seeking care, specialist competence for its treatment in primary care limited and waiting lists for orthopaedics often amongst the longest. Many referrals to orthopaedics do not concern disorders that benefit from surgery. Manual therapy is effective, yet not integrated in national health care systems, and there is a lack of research on other than neck and low back pain, and a lack of long-term follow-ups. The present study evaluates the long-term effects of a manual therapy (naprapathy) for common orthopaedic disorders.

METHODS: An 8-year follow-up (96 months) of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of naprapathy (experimental group) versus standard orthopaedic care (control group) for non-surgical patients of working age with the most common musculoskeletal disorders on the waiting lists (n = 78). Bodily pain, physical function (SF36), Quality of life (QoL; SF6D), and data on health care utilization were collected. The treatments lasted from January 2007 to November 2007.

RESULTS: N = 75 participants in the original study sample completed the 8-year follow-up. The differences in bodily pain (21.7 (95% CI: 9.1-34.3)), physical function (17.6 (6.7-28.4)), and QoLs (0.823 (95% CI: 0.785-0.862) compared with 0.713 (95% CI: 0.668-0.758)) were statistically significantly in favor of the experimental group (p-values < 0.01). After sensitivity analysis the experimental group had altogether 260 health care visits compared with 1161 in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS: Naprapathy is a continuously effective treatment. Together with earlier research our study suggests that specialized manual therapy should be considered when triaging patients with common non-surgical musculoskeletal disorders in national health care systems.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable, as per information given by ClinicalTrials.gov.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2021. Vol. 29, no 1, article id 43
Keywords [en]
Complementary medicine, Integrative medicine, Long-term follow-up, Manual therapy, Non-surgical musculoskeletal disorders, Orthopaedic waiting lists
National Category
Physiotherapy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:shh:diva-4257DOI: 10.1186/s12998-021-00400-6PubMedID: 34727936OAI: oai:DiVA.org:shh-4257DiVA, id: diva2:1618064
Available from: 2021-12-08 Created: 2021-12-08 Last updated: 2025-09-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1038 kB)131 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1038 kBChecksum SHA-512
e5c291ae0defe4d0755e927f7f390e7c46f5d29a39f741260c95556fbfabe383e22db7d7b01ff7f9a48f1d3b15847ff3fde58da22ec0113861d08b3a9d8c15f3
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Lilje, StinaSundberg, TobiasSkillgate, Eva

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lilje, StinaSundberg, TobiasSkillgate, Eva
By organisation
Sophiahemmet University
In the same journal
Chiropractic and Manual Therapies
Physiotherapy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 134 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 426 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf