shh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Patients' and health care professionals' perceptions of the potential of using the digital Diabetes Questionnaire to prepare for diabetes care meetings: Qualitative focus group interview study
Sophiahemmet University.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3309-136x
2020 (English)In: Journal of Medical Internet Research, E-ISSN 1438-8871, Vol. 22, no 8, article id e17504Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: In effective diabetes management, it is important that providers and health care systems prioritize the delivery of patient-centered care and that they are respectful of and responsive to individual patient preferences and barriers.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to conduct focus group interviews to capture patients' and health care professionals' perceptions and attitudes regarding digital technology and to explore how the digital Diabetes Questionnaire can be used to support patient participation in diabetes care, as a basis for an implementation study.

METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted with six focus group discussions with diabetes specialist nurses and medical doctors (n=29) and four focus group discussions with individuals with diabetes (n=23). A semistructured focus group interview guide was developed, including probing questions. The data were transcribed verbatim, and qualitative content analysis was performed using an inductive approach.

RESULTS: Two main categories were revealed by the qualitative analysis: perceptions of digital technology and the digital questionnaire in diabetes management and care and perceptions of participation in diabetes care. An overarching theme that emerged from the focus group interviews was patients' and professionals' involvement in diabetes care using digital tools.

CONCLUSIONS: The analysis identified important factors to consider when introducing the digital Diabetes Questionnaire in clinical use. Both professionals and patients need support and training in the practical implementation of the digital questionnaire, as well as the opportunity to provide feedback on the questionnaire answers.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020. Vol. 22, no 8, article id e17504
Keywords [en]
Digital questionnaire, diabetes care, eHealth, focus group interview, health care professionals, qualitative research
National Category
Endocrinology and Diabetes
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:shh:diva-3798DOI: 10.2196/17504PubMedID: 32812884OAI: oai:DiVA.org:shh-3798DiVA, id: diva2:1469232
Available from: 2020-09-21 Created: 2020-09-21 Last updated: 2025-09-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(223 kB)169 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 223 kBChecksum SHA-512
d91ee017d2c6cabfe2436ddc0802aab419dabadda76c5d86c0b31e8c4dae332627e3d1b301f9153f9148eaa256924f6b46c24ea074c070f1c64d68c3b7c9f515
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Johansson, Unn-Britt

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Johansson, Unn-Britt
By organisation
Sophiahemmet University
In the same journal
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Endocrinology and Diabetes

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 169 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 448 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf