Background: Aortic stenosis is a common valvular heart disease among older adults and may cause significant symptoms such as dyspnea, fatigue, and reduced physical function. For patients who are not suitable candidates for open-heart surgery, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become an established treatment option. Despite favorable medical outcomes, the disease and treatment decision may involve complex experiences for patients, where symptom burden, quality of life, and existential reflections may influence both the decision-making process and the perceived outcome of treatment.
Aim: The aim was to illuminate patients’ experiences of symptoms and the decision-makingprocess prior to TAVI, as well as how the treatment outcome was experienced after the procedure.
Method: A literature review was conducted using a systematic search strategy in the databases PubMed and CINAHL. Sixteen scientific articles with qualitative and quantitative approaches were included after quality appraisal. The included material was analyzed using thematic analysis.
Results: The results show that the period prior to TAVI was characterized by a substantial symptom burden affecting physical function, independence, and social participation. The decision-making process prior to TAVI was characterized by a need for individualized information, trust in healthcare professionals, and support from relatives. For many patients, the decision also evoked existential reflections about ageing, the end of life, and the value of continued treatment. After undergoing TAVI, the majority of patients described improved physical function, reduced dyspnea, and an increased ability to return to everyday activities. At the same time, recovery varied and factors such as comorbidity, advanced age, and unrealistic expectations influenced the perceived outcome. Improvements in physical quality of life were more evident than improvements in psychological quality of life, where some patients continued to experience anxiety, low mood, or limitations despite a technically successful treatment.
Conclusion: The results suggest that TAVI not only affects hemodynamic parameters but also patients’ experiences of health, independence, and quality of life. The findings highlight the importance of person-centered care, individualized information, and structured follow-up that includes both physical and psychosocial aspects before and after the procedure.