shh.sePublikationer
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Unlicensed personnel administering medications to older persons living at home: a challenge for social and care services
Sophiahemmet University.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0553-199X
Sophiahemmet University.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0971-5283
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)In: International Journal of Older People Nursing, ISSN 1748-3735, E-ISSN 1748-3743, Vol. 10, no 3, 201-210 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Administration of medication to care recipients is delegated to home-care assistants working in the municipal social care, alongside responsibility for providing personal assistance for older people. Home-care assistants have practical administration skills, but lack formal medical knowledge.

AIM: The aim of this study was to explore how home-care assistants perceive administration of medication to older people living at home, as delegated to them in the context of social care.

METHODS: Four focus groups consisting of 19 home-care assistants were conducted. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS: According to home-care assistants, health and social care depends on delegation arrangements to function effectively, but in the first place it relieves a burden for district nurses. Even when the delegation had expired, administration of medication continued, placing the statutes of regulation in a subordinate position. There was low awareness among home-care assistants about the content of the statutes of delegation. Accepting delegation to administer medications has become an implicit prerequisite for social care work in the municipality.

CONCLUSIONS: Accepting the delegation to administer medication was inevitable and routine. In practice, the regulating statute is made subordinate and consequently patient safety can be threatened. The organisation of health and social care relies on the delegation arrangement to meet the needs of a growing number of older home-care recipients.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This is a crucial task which management within both the healthcare professions and municipal social care needs to address, to bridge the gap between statutes and practice, to create arenas for mutual collaboration in the care recipients' best interest and to ensure patient safety.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 10, no 3, 201-210 p.
Keyword [en]
Administration of medication, Delegation, District nurse, Home-care assistants, Knowledge
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:shh:diva-1768DOI: 10.1111/opn.12073PubMedID: 25515934OAI: oai:DiVA.org:shh-1768DiVA: diva2:782646
Available from: 2015-01-22 Created: 2015-01-22 Last updated: 2015-12-15Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Medicine management in municipal home care: delegating, administrating and receiving
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Medicine management in municipal home care: delegating, administrating and receiving
2015 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The general aim of this thesis was to investigate how delegation of medication is handled in municipal home care. Specific aims were to 1) explore the prevalence of medication use in older adults over time; 2) describe district nurses’ experiences of the delegation of medication management to municipal home care personnel; 3) explore and describe how home care assistants experience receiving the actual delegation of the responsibility of medication administration; and 4) to describe how older adults, living at home, perceive receiving assistance from home care assistants to manage their own medication. Study I: Changes were explored in medication use over a period of 20 years among three cohorts of older adults aged 78+ years and living in Stockholm, Sweden (1517 participated in 1987; 1581 in 2001; and 1206 in 2007). All were included, whether living at home or in an institution. Univariate analysis was carried out, as well as multivariate logistic regression models. The mean number of drugs increased for both genders in all age groups: from 2.8 in 1987 to 5.8 in 2007 for those aged 78+ years, the corresponding figures for 96+ years was 3.6 and 7.7. Overall (1987, 2001 and 2007), drugs for the cardiovascular system were most frequent (53.1%, 60.8% and 68.7% respectively). Prevalence of polypharmacy (concurrent use of five drugs or more) increased from 27.0% (1987) to 53.9% (2001), and 65.3% (2007). Adjusting for age, gender, education and cognition, the odds of using analgesics and psychotropics were significantly higher in 2007 compared to 1987; OR (95% CI) of 3.3 (2.8-4.0) and 1.3 (1.1-1.6) respectively. Cognitively intact elderly primarily used hypnotics, whereas cognitively impaired elderly used hypnotics, sedatives and antidepressants. People living at home used fewer drugs. For those living in institutions, polypharmacy increased from 24.4% in 1987 to 95.3% in 2007. Corresponding figures for those living in service buildings were 44.6% to 82.4%. Study II: District nurses’ (DNs) perceptions of the concept of delegating the administration of medication to unlicensed personnel (home care aides, HCAs) working in municipal social care were described. Twenty DNs were interviewed and the interviews were audio taped. Data were collected from April 2009 to August 2010 and analysed using content analysis. Findings revealed that the statutes of delegation were outdated and appeared to be incompatible with day to day practice. Communication between DNs and HCAs, as well as tutoring, was regarded as important. The DNs found it imperative to be available to the HCAs and made an effort to create a trusting atmosphere. Delegation of administration of medication to a person, who lacked knowledge of medication, for example when it is proper to mix pills or blend them in a thick liquid, was reported by the DN as being stressful. This was explained by various responsible authorities and the growing number of social service groups. Despite this, the DNs did not see any major problems with the fact that the HCAs work for a separate authority (the county council vs. the municipality). Study III: The purpose was to explore and describe how HCAs experience receiving the delegation of medicine management, and how they handle the responsibility that comes with the delegation. Four focus groups consisting of 19 HCAs were conducted. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. According to the HCAs, health and social care depends on delegation arrangements to function effectively, but mainly it relieves a burden for DNs. Even when the delegation had expired, administration of medication continued, placing the statutes of regulation in a subordinate position. There was low awareness among HCAs of the content of the statutes of delegation. Accepting delegation to administer medication was an inevitable and a routine fact, regarded as a mandatory task that had become an implicit prerequisite for social care work in the municipality. Study IV: Finally, we wanted to describe how older people, living at home, experience the use and assistance of administration of medicines in the context of social care. Ten older adults, aged 68 to 94 years, were interviewed in their own homes. Latent content analysis was used. There were divided feelings about being dependent on assistance in handling medication, since it interfered with their autonomy at a time of health transition. On the other hand, the assistance eases daily life with regard to practical matters and improves adherence to a medicine regimen. Participants were balancing empowerment and a dubious perception of the home care assistants’ knowledge of medicine and safety. The trust in the physicians’ and DNs’ knowledge about medication routines was seen as a guarantee with regard to medicines in general and the medicine regimen in particular. The perceived strained work situation for HCAs risks placing older people in an adverse position in relation to HCAs with their heavy workload and limited schedules. This may negatively influence the care relationship and patient safety. Conclusions: This thesis reports: 1) A dramatic increase in medication use in older adults from the late 1980s to the mid- 2000s in central Stockholm, Sweden; 2) DNs cannot manage their workload without delegating the administration of medication to unlicensed personnel (HCAs) in the present organisational model of health- and social care; 3) Accepting the delegation to administer medication was inevitable and had become routine to meet the needs of a growing number of older home care recipients; and 4) Assistance with handling medication eases daily life and medicine regimen adherence. Dependence on assistance may affect older adults’ sense of autonomy. Perceived safety varied relating to HCAs’ knowledge of medicine. We believe our results may contribute to a better understanding of how health and social care, two fields spanning sociology and nursing, perceive and adjust to the given frames; in the first place by indicating how delegated administration of medication to older people living at home is perceived by the care recipients, DNs, and HCAs and also by illustrating how the possibility of delegating medical chores can give temporary tasks a manifest transition from licensed to unlicensed personnel.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet, 2015. 46 p.
Keyword
Delegation, District nurse, Home dwelling, Home care, Home care assistent, Health care, Medication use, Medication management, Polypharmacy, Population-based, Time trends, Task shifting, Responsible authorities, Older people, Delegering, Distriktssjuksköterska, Hemmaboende, Hemtjänst, Hemtjänstpersonal, Hälso- och sjukvård, Medicinanvändning, Medicinhantering, Polyfarmaci, Populationsbaserad, Tidstrender, Uppgiftsväxling, Huvudmän, Äldre
National Category
Health Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:shh:diva-1776 (URN)978-91-7549-804-1 (ISBN)
Public defence
2015-03-04, Sophiahemmet University, Erforssalen, Valhallavägen 91, Hus R, Stockholm, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2015-02-11 Created: 2015-02-06 Last updated: 2016-06-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(364 kB)57 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 364 kBChecksum SHA-512
5e9448e68d3d3da6bb9a063f349c19d8e74e0dcbe35ff9ebce5497863450f6338bbbdfa73732ff8f3a69124fc038dbba0db1fc50bd488ef9d9e16689b0363841
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Craftman, ÅsaHillerås, PernillaWesterbotn, Margareta
By organisation
Sophiahemmet University
In the same journal
International Journal of Older People Nursing
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 57 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 229 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf