shh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Long-term follow-up of a person-centered prehabilitation program based on cognitive-behavioral physical therapy for patients scheduled for lumbar fusion
Sophiahemmet University.
Sophiahemmet University.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3016-6960
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Physical Therapy, ISSN 0031-9023, E-ISSN 1538-6724, Vol. 104, no 8, article id pzae069Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVE: Long-term follow-ups of prehabilitation programs for lumbar spine surgery are lacking, and more comprehensive evaluations are needed. In the current study, we evaluated the long-term effects of a prehabilitation program compared with conventional care in relation to lumbar fusion surgery in patients with degenerative disc disease.

METHODS: Patients (n = 118) receiving lumbar fusion surgery were included in a multicenter randomized controlled trial, involving 1 university hospital and 2 spine clinics. The intervention was a person-centered prehabilitation program based on cognitive-behavioral physical therapy that targeted psychological presurgical risk factors, physical activity, and overall health. The control group received conventional preoperative care. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) included assessments at 8 time-points: Low back disability (primary outcome), back pain intensity, leg pain intensity, pain catastrophizing, fear of movement, anxiety and depressive mood, health-related quality of life, and patient-specific functioning. Physical activity and physical capacity were assessed at 5 time points. Linear mixed models were used to analyze the effects of the intervention.

RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups at the 12- and 24-month follow-ups for any outcome, except for the One Leg Stand test 1 year following surgery, in favor of the control group. There were significant improvements for both groups, from baseline to the 12- and 24-month follow-ups for all physical capacity test and PROMs, except for leg pain and self-efficacy for exercise.

CONCLUSIONS: No long-term effects were found for the prehabilitation program compared to conventional care. Physical activity did not improve over time, despite significantly improved self-reported functioning and physical capacity measurements.

IMPACT: These findings have implications for the current understanding of the long-term effects of prehabilitation and suggest that future research should focus on programs promoting physical activity both before and after lumbar spine surgery to decrease the risk of long-term adverse health outcomes.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2024. Vol. 104, no 8, article id pzae069
Keywords [en]
Cognitive Behavioral Approach, Lumbar Fusion Surgery, Person-Centered Care, Prehabilitation
National Category
Physiotherapy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:shh:diva-5362DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzae069PubMedID: 38753831OAI: oai:DiVA.org:shh-5362DiVA, id: diva2:1871599
Available from: 2024-06-17 Created: 2024-06-17 Last updated: 2025-02-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Hanafi, RikardLundberg, Mari

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hanafi, RikardLundberg, Mari
By organisation
Sophiahemmet University
In the same journal
Physical Therapy
Physiotherapy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 108 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf