shh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Differences between registered nurses and nurse assistants around missed nursing care: An observational, comparative study
2023 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, ISSN 0283-9318, E-ISSN 1471-6712, Vol. 37, no 4, p. 1028-1037Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: From a nursing perspective, tasks that are not carried out, and the consequences of this, have been studied for over a decade. The difference between Registered Nurses (RNs) and nurse assistants (NAs) regarding qualifications and work tasks, and the profound knowledge around RN-to-patient ratios, warrants investigating missed nursing care (MNC) for each group rather than as one (nursing staff).

AIM: To describe and compare RNs and NAs ratings of and reasons for MNC at in-hospital wards.

METHODS: A cross-sectional study with a comparative approach. RNs and NAs at in-hospital medical and surgical wards for adults were invited to answer the MISSCARE Survey-Swedish version, including questions on patient safety and quality of care.

RESULTS: A total of 205 RNs and 219 NAs answered the questionnaire. Quality of care and patient safety was rated as good by both RNs and NAs. Compared to NAs, RNs reported more MNC, for example, in the item 'Turning patient every 2 h' (p < 0.001), 'Ambulation three times per day or as ordered' (p = 0.018), and 'Mouth care' (p < 0.001). NAs reported more MNC in the items 'Medications administered within 30 min before or after scheduled time' (p = 0.005), and 'Patient medication requests acted on within 15 min' (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found between the samples concerning reasons for MNC.

CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that RNs' and NAs' ratings of MNC to a large extent differed between the groups. RNs and NAs should be viewed as separate groups based on their different knowledge levels and roles when caring for patients. Thus, viewing all nursing staff as a homogenous group in MNC research may mask important differences between the groups. These differences are important to address when taking actions to reduce MNC in the clinical setting.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2023. Vol. 37, no 4, p. 1028-1037
Keywords [en]
Missed nursing care, Patient safety, Quality of care
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:shh:diva-4914DOI: 10.1111/scs.13175PubMedID: 37114356OAI: oai:DiVA.org:shh-4914DiVA, id: diva2:1759255
Available from: 2023-05-25 Created: 2023-05-25 Last updated: 2023-12-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(496 kB)35 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 496 kBChecksum SHA-512
d805d0429d62549bcdabaea00930b0153d16db836e95d6005302d5504ee80a1ebadca4bcf1432328fdd4fede437d6e5f89b8ba204f63cc564533517f83ec88ff
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Falk, Ann-Charlotte

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Falk, Ann-Charlotte
In the same journal
Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 35 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 171 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf