shh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Developing a European longitudinal and interprofessional curriculum for clinical reasoning
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany), ISSN 2194-802X, Vol. 10, no 3, p. 218-224Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Clinical reasoning is a complex and crucial ability health professions students need to acquire during their education. Despite its importance, explicit clinical reasoning teaching is not yet implemented in most health professions educational programs. Therefore, we carried out an international and interprofessional project to plan and develop a clinical reasoning curriculum with a train-the-trainer course to support educators in teaching this curriculum to students. We developed a framework and curricular blueprint. Then we created 25 student and 7 train-the-trainer learning units and we piloted 11 of these learning units at our institutions. Learners and faculty reported high satisfaction and they also provided helpful suggestions for improvements. One of the main challenges we faced was the heterogeneous understanding of clinical reasoning within and across professions. However, we learned from each other while discussing these different views and perspectives on clinical reasoning and were able to come to a shared understanding as the basis for developing the curriculum. Our curriculum fills an important gap in the availability of explicit clinical reasoning educational materials both for students and faculty and is unique with having specialists from different countries, schools, and professions. Faculty time and time for teaching clinical reasoning in existing curricula remain important barriers for implementation of clinical reasoning teaching.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2023. Vol. 10, no 3, p. 218-224
Keywords [en]
Clinical reasoning, Curriculum development, Faculty development, Interprofessional
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:shh:diva-4770DOI: 10.1515/dx-2022-0103PubMedID: 36800998OAI: oai:DiVA.org:shh-4770DiVA, id: diva2:1748386
Available from: 2023-04-03 Created: 2023-04-03 Last updated: 2023-09-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(887 kB)65 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 887 kBChecksum SHA-512
4ea75d9616a8e9b30890a80d206592ae6635da7c11b7d32bc52b914a6e9f9fdf10c7d267079d1018c94d10896383b3c1e96b1ddc87125b38416f1cdb5272afa6
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed
By organisation
Sophiahemmet University
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 65 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 113 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf