shh.sePublications
Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 10/12-2024, at 12:00-13:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
EFAS Score-Validation of Spanish and Estonian Versions by the score committee of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS)
Sophiahemmet University.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6034-6068
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: Foot and Ankle Surgery, ISSN 1268-7731, E-ISSN 1460-9584, Vol. 29, no 3, p. 180-187, article id S1268-7731(23)00039-5Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: The Score Committee of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS) developed, validated, and published the EFAS Score in 11 languages (Dutch, English, German, Finnish, French, Italian, Polish, Portuguese, Persian, Swedish, Turkish). From other languages under validation, the Spanish and Estonian versions completed data acquisition and underwent further validation.

METHODS: The EFAS Score was developed and validated in three stages: 1) item (question) identification (completed during the initial validation study), 2) item reduction and scale exploration (completed during the initial validation study), 3) confirmatory analyses and responsiveness of the Spanish and Estonian versions (completed during the initial validation study in seven other languages). The data were collected pre-operatively and post-operatively at a minimum follow-up of 3 months and mean follow-up of 6 months. Item reduction, scale exploration, confirmatory analyses and responsiveness were executed using classical test theory and item response theory.

RESULTS: The internal consistency of the scale was confirmed in the Spanish and Estonian versions (Cronbach's Alpha>0.8). Responsiveness was good, with moderate to large effect sizes in both languages, and evidence of a statistically significant positive association between the EFAS Score and patient-reported improvement.

CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish and Estonian EFAS Score versions were successfully validated in orthopaedic ankle and foot surgery patients, with a wide variety of foot and ankle pathologies. All score versions are freely available at www.efas.net.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2023. Vol. 29, no 3, p. 180-187, article id S1268-7731(23)00039-5
Keywords [en]
Ankle, Estonian, Foot, Patient reported Outcome Measure (PROM), Score, Spanish, Validation
National Category
Physiotherapy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:shh:diva-4772DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2023.02.010PubMedID: 36858898OAI: oai:DiVA.org:shh-4772DiVA, id: diva2:1748370
Available from: 2023-04-03 Created: 2023-04-03 Last updated: 2023-05-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Ågren, Per-Henrik

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ågren, Per-Henrik
By organisation
Sophiahemmet University
In the same journal
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Physiotherapy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 23 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf