shh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Missed nursing care in the critical care unit, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative cross-sectional study
2022 (English)In: Intensive & Critical Care Nursing, ISSN 0964-3397, E-ISSN 1532-4036, Vol. 72, article id 103276Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVES: Todescribe and evaluate reported missed nursing care in the critical care context during different phases of the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: A comparative cross-sectional design was used, comparing missed nursing care in three samples: before the COVID-19 pandemic in 2019, during the second wave of the pandemic in spring 2020, and during the third wave of the pandemic in fall 2021.

SETTING: The study was conducted at critical care units at a university hospital, Sweden.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The MISSCARE Survey-Swedish version was used to collect data along with two study-specific questions concerning perception of patient safety and quality of care.

RESULTS: Significantly more overtime hours and number of days absent due to illness were reported during the pandemic. The nurse/patient ratio was above the recommended level at all data collection time points. Most missed nursing care was reported in items concerning basic care. The most reported reasons for missed nursing care in all samples concerned inadequate staffing, urgent situations, and a rise in patient volume. Most nurses in all samples perceived the level of patient safety and quality of care as good, and the majority had no intention to leave their current position.

CONCLUSION: The pandemic had a great impact on the critical care workforce but few elements of missed nursing care were affected. To measure and use missed nursing care as a quality indicator could be valuable for nursing managers, to inform them and improve their ability to meet changes in patient needs with different workforce approaches in critical care settings.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2022. Vol. 72, article id 103276
Keywords [en]
Critical care, Cross-sectional studies, Missed nursing care, Nursing, Quality of care, Workforce
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:shh:diva-4522DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2022.103276PubMedID: 35672210OAI: oai:DiVA.org:shh-4522DiVA, id: diva2:1674726
Available from: 2022-06-22 Created: 2022-06-22 Last updated: 2023-01-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(430 kB)116 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 430 kBChecksum SHA-512
159fcb31d5899f8da3d32d1a588688d3c083cb093dbfae7557e32211dcca1afa6754148526f8fc0c22a685baa4ed515971b7006625acd9b91337bbfd488a8fac
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Falk, Ann-Charlotte

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Falk, Ann-Charlotte
In the same journal
Intensive & Critical Care Nursing
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 116 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 87 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf