shh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Implementing the Digital Diabetes Questionnaire as a clinical tool in routine diabetes care: Focus group discussions with patients and health care professionals
Sophiahemmet University.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3309-136x
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: JMIR Diabetes, ISSN 2371-4379, Vol. 7, no 2, article id e34561Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: The Diabetes Questionnaire is a digital patient-reported outcome and experience measure for adults living with diabetes. The Diabetes Questionnaire is intended for use in routine clinical visits in diabetes care and to enable patient perspectives to be integrated into the Swedish National Diabetes Register. The Diabetes Questionnaire was developed on the basis of patients' perspectives, and evidence for its measurement qualities has been demonstrated. Patients receive an invitation to complete the questionnaire before clinical visits, and the patient and health care professional (HCP) can discuss the findings, which are instantly displayed during the visit. Implementation processes for new tools in routine care need to be studied to understand the influence of contextual factors, the support needed, and how patients and HCPs experience clinical use.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe patients' and HCPs' experiences of initiating the use of the digital Diabetes Questionnaire as a clinical tool in routine diabetes care, supported by a structured implementation strategy involving initial education, local facilitators, and regular follow-ups.

METHODS: In this qualitative study, semistructured focus group discussions were conducted 12 months after the use of the Diabetes Questionnaire was initiated. Participants were diabetes specialist nurses and physicians (20 participants in 4 groups) at hospital-based outpatient clinics or primary health care clinics and adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes (15 participants in 4 groups). The audiotaped transcripts were analyzed using inductive qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS: The results revealed 2 main categories that integrated patients' and HCPs' experiences, which together formed an overarching theme: While implementation demands new approaches, the Diabetes Questionnaire provides a broader perspective. The first main category (The Diabetes Questionnaire supports person-centered clinical visits) comprised comments expressing that the digital Diabetes Questionnaire can initiate and encourage reflection in preparation for clinical visits, bring important topics to light during clinical visits, and broaden the scope of discussion by providing additional information. The second main category (The process of initiating the implementation of the Diabetes Questionnaire) comprised comments that described differences in engagement among HCPs and their managers, challenges of establishing new routines, experiences of support during implementation, thoughts about the Diabetes Questionnaire, need to change local administrative routines, and opportunities and concerns for continued use.

CONCLUSIONS: The Diabetes Questionnaire can broaden the scope of health data in routine diabetes care. While implementation demands new approaches, patients and HCPs saw potential positive impacts of using the questionnaire at both the individual and group levels. Our results can inform further development of implementation strategies to support the clinical use of the questionnaire.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2022. Vol. 7, no 2, article id e34561
Keywords [en]
Diabetes mellitus, type 1, Diabetes mellitus, type 2, Focus groups, Health care professionals, Outpatients, Patient care, Patient participation, Patient-reported outcome measures, Qualitative research, Registries
National Category
Endocrinology and Diabetes
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:shh:diva-4500DOI: 10.2196/34561PubMedID: 35612885OAI: oai:DiVA.org:shh-4500DiVA, id: diva2:1662685
Available from: 2022-06-01 Created: 2022-06-01 Last updated: 2022-06-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(227 kB)76 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 227 kBChecksum SHA-512
43d3a56a7de6d33e01d95d49045cbec746dd9ca3a2dc287d20a900fca14d8999a05ad880e5bda8e19a930a6269372dba22c97457ef9f22f9cbb6821a5c62a2f8
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Johansson, Unn-Britt

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Johansson, Unn-Britt
By organisation
Sophiahemmet University
Endocrinology and Diabetes

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 76 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 181 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf