shh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Process evaluation of the Sophia Step Study: A primary care based three-armed randomized controlled trial using self-monitoring of steps with and without counseling in prediabetes and type 2 diabetes
Sophiahemmet University.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4920-252x
Sophiahemmet University.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4607-8677
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: BMC Public Health, E-ISSN 1471-2458, Vol. 21, no 1, article id 1191Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Describing implementation features of an intervention is required to compare interventions and to inform policy and best practice. The aim of this study was to conduct a process evaluation of the first 12 months of the Sophia Step Study: a primary care based RCT evaluating a multicomponent (self-monitoring of daily steps plus counseling) and a single component (self-monitoring of steps only) physical activity intervention to standard care on cardiometabolic health.

METHODS: The evaluation was guided by the Medical Research Council Guidance for complex interventions. To describe the implementation communication with the health professionals implementing the interventions, attendance records and tracking of days with self-monitored pedometer-determined steps were used. Change in physical activity behaviour was measured at baseline, 6 and 12 months as daily steps by accelerometry.

RESULTS: During April 2013 to January 2018 188 participants were randomized and intervened directly after inclusion. Response rate was 49% and drop out was 10%. A majority, 78%, had type 2 diabetes and 22% were diagnosed with prediabetes. Mean [Standard deviation (SD)] body mass index was 30.4 (4.4) kg/m2 and steps per day was 6566 (3086). The interventions were delivered as intended with minor deviation from the protocol and dose received was satisfying for both the multicomponent and single component group. The mean [95% Confidence Interval (CI)] change in daily steps from baseline to 6 months was 941(227, 1655) steps/day for the multicomponent intervention group, 990 (145, 1836) step/day for the single component group and - 506 (- 1118, 107) for the control group. The mean (95% CI) change in daily steps from baseline to 12 months was 31(- 507, 570) steps/day for the multicomponent intervention group, 144 (- 566, 853) step/day for the single component group and - 890 (- 1485, - 294) for the control group. There was a large individual variation in daily steps at baseline as well as in step change in all three groups.

CONCLUSIONS: Applying self-monitoring of steps is a feasible method to implement as support for physical activity in the primary care setting both with and without counseling support.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02374788 . Registered 2 March 2015.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2021. Vol. 21, no 1, article id 1191
Keywords [en]
Feasibility, Implementation, Pedometers, Physical activity, Prediabetes, Primary care, Self-monitoring, Type 2 diabetes
National Category
Endocrinology and Diabetes
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:shh:diva-4166DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11222-9PubMedID: 34157994OAI: oai:DiVA.org:shh-4166DiVA, id: diva2:1584212
Available from: 2021-08-11 Created: 2021-08-11 Last updated: 2023-08-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1985 kB)211 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 1985 kBChecksum SHA-512
fe20c70c1df346c4eb0d729b04503f2bb2d50872c94ad6681a47c49268d69aa85a1120831966d1b638b1fcf18eba1458f9830f6d44b079c3d3543f531650c7af
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Rossen, JennyHagströmer, MariaJohansson, Unn-Britt

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rossen, JennyHagströmer, MariaJohansson, Unn-Britt
By organisation
Sophiahemmet University
In the same journal
BMC Public Health
Endocrinology and Diabetes

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 211 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 304 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf