shh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A psychometric evaluation of the Functional assessment of cancer therapy-kidney symptom index (FKSI-19) among renal cell carcinoma patients suggesting an alternative two-factor structure
Sophiahemmet University.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1280-7560
2021 (English)In: Quality of Life Research, ISSN 0962-9343, E-ISSN 1573-2649Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

PURPOSE: To psychometrically evaluate the hypothesized four-factor structure of the 19-item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI-19) health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument in a sample of surgically treated renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients and examine if an alternative factor structure with good psychometric properties may be derived from the available items.

METHODS: The model fit of the hypothesized four-factor structure was examined using confirmatory factor analysis on cohort data from 1731 individuals included in the National Swedish Kidney Cancer Register who had undergone surgery for RCC during the three years 2016-2018 and answered the FKSI-19 instrument within 6-12 months after surgery. Exploratory factor analysis was applied to the same dataset to derive a possible alternative factor solution.

RESULTS: The four-factor structure did not reach the thresholds for good model fit using the normed χ2-value or the Comparative Fit Index, although the Standardized Root Mean Square Residual and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation measures indicated good and acceptable model fits, respectively. An alternative 14-item trimmed FKSI version (FKSI-14) with a two-factor structure derived from the available FKSI-19 items was found to measure the same aspects of HRQoL as the full FKSI-19 instrument.

CONCLUSION: The present study is the first to use psychometric methods for examining the factor structure of the FKSI-19 instrument. The hypothesized four-factor structure of FKSI-19 provided a barely acceptable model fit. The two-factor FKSI-14 structure may be used as an alternative or complement to the four-factor structure when interpreting the FKSI-19 instrument.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2021.
Keywords [en]
Factor analysis, Health-related quality of life, Kidney cancer, Patient-reported outcomes, Psychometric analysis, Renal cancer carcinoma
National Category
Cancer and Oncology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:shh:diva-4041DOI: 10.1007/s11136-021-02839-9PubMedID: 33846957OAI: oai:DiVA.org:shh-4041DiVA, id: diva2:1548738
Available from: 2021-05-03 Created: 2021-05-03 Last updated: 2021-06-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(706 kB)125 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 706 kBChecksum SHA-512
f9995c77bd567a75ef7dfa59955a8cfcc5c090e4966c522e6e47466e68d9fb3c2b88450f4b19e763682b70ddd7444f07815d3a47025cb4fe39a93609b39f12e5
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Westman, Bodil

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Westman, Bodil
By organisation
Sophiahemmet University
In the same journal
Quality of Life Research
Cancer and Oncology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 125 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 214 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf