shh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Prospective randomized controlled pilot study on orbital blowout fracture
Sophiahemmet University.
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction, ISSN 1943-3875, E-ISSN 1943-3883, Vol. 11, no 3, p. 165-171Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

To clarify the conflicting recommendations for care of blowout fracture (BOF), a prospective randomized study is required. Here, we present a prospective randomized pilot study on BOF. This article aimed to evaluate which computed tomography (CT) findings predict late functional and/or cosmetic symptoms in BOF patients with ≥ 1.0 mL herniation of orbital content into maxillary and/or ethmoidal sinuses. It also aimed to evaluate which patients with BOF would benefit from surgical treatment or observational follow-up. Twenty-six patients with BOF ≥ 1.0 mL herniation were randomized to observational ( n  = 10) or surgical treatments ( n  = 16) and were followed up for functional and cosmetic symptoms for at least 1 year. The results from CT scan measurements were correlated to the patients' symptoms and clinical findings which we report in this pilot study. Of the 10 patients randomized to observation, five had an inferomedial BOF with a herniation of ≥ 1.3 mL and all patients developed cosmetic deformities and required surgery. The remaining five patients in the observational group had inferior BOF and one of them had a distance of 3.3 cm from the inferior orbital rim to the posterior edge of the fracture and developed a cosmetic deformity but was unwilling to proceed to surgical treatment, and four patients had a median distance of 2.9 cm from the inferior orbital rim to the posterior edge of the fracture and did not develop cosmetic deformities. The median time from injury to surgery was 13 (3-17) days for the surgical group and 37 (17-170) days for the patients who underwent surgery in the observational group. The surgical results were similar for all the operated patients at the final control. Diplopia decreased and remained partly in one patient in the surgical group and in two patients in the observational group. Hypoesthesia of the infraorbital nerve decreased in nonsurgically treated patients, but surgery seemed to induce hypoesthesia. In this prospective randomized controlled pilot study on BOF, all patients in the observational group with inferomedial fractures developed visible deformity. Diplopia in BOF, without ocular motility limitation, is believed to be due to edema. Diplopia is not an indication for surgery as long as it reduces over time.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. Vol. 11, no 3, p. 165-171
Keywords [en]
enophthalmus, orbital blowout fracture, prospective, randomized, surgical indication, visible deformity
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:shh:diva-3159DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1641170PubMedID: 30087745OAI: oai:DiVA.org:shh-3159DiVA, id: diva2:1261802
Available from: 2018-11-08 Created: 2018-11-08 Last updated: 2020-06-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Ryott, Michael

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ryott, Michael
By organisation
Sophiahemmet University
In the same journal
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 396 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf